Comments on: Coming Commercial Real Estate Collaspe- Nothing Can Prevent Next Real Estate Crash?!?!

By: ngonea

ngonea — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:59:03 +0000

theserf3 – wanna know where the money went? it went to Europe, check Max Keiser videos forï»¿ more details

By: herbs814

herbs814 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:32:01 +0000

and whenï»¿ you can’t make an intelligent argument, you resort to insults? LAME.

By: MrNeo2001

MrNeo2001 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:36:17 +0000

herbs814, whatever dude. Keep watching Jim Cramerï»¿ & listening to Sean Hannity. It obviously has made you more intelligent! ROFL

By: herbs814

herbs814 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:41:51 +0000

first you claim that there will be no money, then you claim that more money will be printed, completely changing your argument. If people cannot get “their” money at the bank, then the money that remains in circulation will increase in value (people will mark down pricesï»¿ to reduce inventory and get more cash to meet payments). If more money is printed (and if that money can be delivered to depositors-consumers), existing money in circulation is devalued (prices rise). Two different scenarios

By: MrNeo2001

MrNeo2001 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:21:16 +0000

No I didn’t, think about it herbs, the FDIC insures most bank patrons for upto $250K…meaning if their money is lost anything upto that amount is protected by the Gov’t, by operating in the RED means they don’t even have the money that they claim insures you!ï»¿ The solution: To print more money to paper over the problem, I don’t see how you believe that makes the dollar MORE valuable?!

By: herbs814

herbs814 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:06:16 +0000

you contradicted yourself: if there will be less money, then the money that remains will be MORE valuable, unless and until governmentï»¿ completely demonitizes the dollar.

By: herbs814

herbs814 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:12:25 +0000

increased government spending has never helped the economy. Even during wartime, the “multiplier” is less than 1. In peacetime, the multiplier of government spending is even lower. Government spending is always a net LOSS to society: it always takes more from social power than it returns. And Obama’s rosy assessment of the budget and stimulus assumes a magical multiplier of 1.5 — which has never occurred in the history of mankind. Government spending to revive the economy isï»¿ utter foolishness.

By: herbs814

herbs814 — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:54:10 +0000

“someone’s gonna have to be bailed out” (4:34)someone’s going toï»¿ clamor for a bailout. someone’s going to mount a public relations campaign appealing for a bailout. but this does not mean that imprudent lenders need to have a bailout to “save” our economy, no matter what claims are made to support Keynesian “stimulus” or “multiplier” effects.

By: panther9mm

panther9mm — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:13:39 +0000

yes, the dow will be at least 5,500 by the end of this year. maybe it can be aboveï»¿ 10,000 too.

By: panther9mm

panther9mm — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:27:11 +0000

you are already poor, so it will not affect you much. as more people join the poverty list, it may look like you areï»¿ moving up